Mice used in ridiculous experiment to mimic human stammering
More cruel, unreliable and pointless animal experiments
Posted in Science
Researchers in the USA are using mice in bizarre and pointless experiments to try and learn more about why humans stammer.
Stammering, also known as stuttering, is a speech disorder where the flow of speech is interrupted by repetitions, pauses or prolongations of certain words and sounds. It is most common in childhood and can often be treated with speech therapy.
The exact cause of stammering in humans remains unknown but has previously been thought to be triggered by stress and anxiety. More recently, scientists have found that a mutation in a particular gene, which is normally responsible for clearing waste from cells in the body, is common in people who stutter.
Based on this discovery, scientists at the Washington University School of Medicine have bred genetically modified mice with this genetic mutation and subjected them to a series of cruel experiments to determine whether they could be used as a suitable ‘model’ for human stuttering. In the first part of the experiment, new born mice were placed alone inside special chambers where their squeaks were recorded as they cried out for their mothers. The squeaks were then analysed by a computer and compared to those from normal mice.
When the mice were six months old they were subjected to a series of cruel behavioural tests, which included:
Sources:
- Startling the mice with loud noises
- Shocking their feet with electricity
- Forcing them to swim in inescapable pools of water
- Making them balance on rotating rods
- Placing them on open mazes high off the ground
Sources:
- Researchers genetically engineer mice to stutter, laying basis for model of the human speech disorder. (2016). National Post, 14 April: http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/researchers-genetically-engineer-mice-to-stutter-laying-basis-for-model-of-the-human-speech-disorder
- A mutation associated with stuttering alters mouse pup ultrasonic vocalisations. (2016). Current Biology, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.068.